Cal St. Fullerton
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,016  Sierra Ungerman JR 21:35
1,073  Emily Taylor SR 21:40
1,488  Pamela Pelayo JR 22:09
1,584  Stephanie Ruiz JR 22:15
1,861  Stephanie Cortez FR 22:33
1,997  Nisreen Rizk JR 22:43
2,271  Kevelin Huerta FR 23:04
2,378  Emily Ruiz JR 23:13
2,714  Ruby Rodriguez FR 23:52
2,858  Marissa Pluma FR 24:15
2,869  Abby Buckhoff JR 24:16
National Rank #212 of 339
West Region Rank #30 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 30th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Sierra Ungerman Emily Taylor Pamela Pelayo Stephanie Ruiz Stephanie Cortez Nisreen Rizk Kevelin Huerta Emily Ruiz Ruby Rodriguez Marissa Pluma Abby Buckhoff
Rim Rock Classic 10/03 1240 21:40 21:33 22:17 21:55 22:13 22:30 23:19 24:00
UCR - Highlander Invitational 10/17 1252 21:37 21:52 22:18 22:21 23:00 22:33 23:25 23:09 24:07 24:28
Titan Invitational 10/23 23:07 23:32 24:53 23:14
Big West Championships 10/31 1265 21:48 22:03 21:44 22:14 23:12 23:36 23:05 23:14 24:31
West Region Championships 11/13 1227 21:18 21:22 22:14 22:35 22:05 22:40 23:17





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 29.9 852 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.4 3.6 6.6 12.1 18.4 20.6 13.3



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Sierra Ungerman 130.9
Emily Taylor 138.7
Pamela Pelayo 182.3
Stephanie Ruiz 191.3
Stephanie Cortez 213.7
Nisreen Rizk 223.7
Kevelin Huerta 242.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 0.0% 0.0 20
21 0.0% 0.0 21
22 0.3% 0.3 22
23 0.4% 0.4 23
24 0.8% 0.8 24
25 1.4% 1.4 25
26 3.6% 3.6 26
27 6.6% 6.6 27
28 12.1% 12.1 28
29 18.4% 18.4 29
30 20.6% 20.6 30
31 13.3% 13.3 31
32 9.2% 9.2 32
33 5.9% 5.9 33
34 4.1% 4.1 34
35 2.0% 2.0 35
36 0.9% 0.9 36
37 0.2% 0.2 37
38 0.1% 0.1 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0